Did Jesus exist historically?
1. Hostile Sources Acknowledge Jesus
Even non-Christian historians mention Jesus:
Tacitus (Roman historian, Annals 15.44, c. 116 AD):
“Christus, from whom the name [Christians] had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of... Pontius Pilatus…”
Josephus (Jewish historian, Antiquities 18.3.3, c. 93 AD):
“Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man... a doer of wonderful works... he was [called] the Christ…”
Pliny the Younger, Suetonius, Lucian of Samosata, and the Talmud also reference Jesus—none as believers, yet all acknowledge His existence.
Fact: There is more documentation for Jesus of Nazareth than for Socrates, Alexander the Great, or Julius Caesar. To deny Jesus’s existence is to throw out all ancient history.
Historian Bart Ehrman (agnostic):
“The reality is that every single author who mentions Jesus—pagan, Christian, or Jewish—was fully convinced that he at least lived.”
(Did Jesus Exist?, 2012)
Biblical Backing:
"That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and have touched with our hands... the life was made manifest, and we have seen it..." - 1 John 1:1-2
"The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham." - Matthew 1:1
"For we did not follow cleverly devised myths... but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty." - 2 Peter 1:16
Philosophical Reasoning:
1. The Argument from Conceptual Incongruity:
Ask yourself:
“Where did the idea of Jesus come from?”
No Jew would invent a crucified Messiah (Deut. 21:23 = cursed).
No Roman would fabricate a humble peasant Savior—their gods were strong, vengeful, and elite.
No Greek philosopher would dream up a God who dies for enemies. That was utter foolishness.
“We preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles…” (1 Cor. 1:23)
Yet this exact man—Jesus of Nazareth—emerges suddenly in history.
The only logical explanation: He was real. And His life caused the concept.
2. Pascal’s Razor (Modified Occam’s Razor):
"If Jesus didn't exist, we must believe a greater miracle than the Gospels: that someone invented Him."
It is more plausible to believe that:
A real man walked the earth,
Said the things attributed to Him,
And started a movement that grew despite persecution,
…than to believe that multiple authors, across different regions, somehow invented a morally flawless, radically counter-cultural God-Man, and convinced the world of it—without a real person behind it.
Real-World Analogy:
If we throw out Jesus, we must also toss out every ancient figure. But no one does that—because the evidence is overwhelming.
Suppose a man claimed that Abraham Lincoln never existed—that the Civil War was a myth made up to unify a broken nation. You show him:
Letters by Lincoln
Newspapers from the time
Testimonies from soldiers and political opponents
Photos and monuments
He replies, “All that could have been made up.”
At this point, you're no longer debating a rational person, but a denier of reality.
Denying Jesus’s existence is even more absurd—because His life altered calendars (AD/BC), empires, ethics, and millions of lives—including mine and countless others.
Clarity:
Even if a skeptic rejects the Bible, faith, and miracles, they are intellectually cornered:
They must admit that Jesus of Nazareth was a real person, crucified under Pontius Pilate, who sparked a movement so profound, it reshaped the world.
To deny that is not academic—it is ideological refusal.
"We did not follow cleverly devised myths..." (2 Peter 1:16, ESV)
"But these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God..." (John 20:31, ESV)
There is no serious historian, atheist or believer, teaching at any major university today who denies the historical existence of Jesus.
So, the question isn’t “Did Jesus exist?”
It’s: “Now that you know He did… what will you do with Him?”
"Who do you say that I am?" (Matthew 16:15, ESV)